Answer: the north
Explanation:
I this is a question about the civil war or at least that time perion the only answer is the north because the south tried to abandon the north because they were being unfair towards the south and trying to take their money because the carpet baggers and other northerners were beginning to loose money from the south because of things like the cotton gen rise in slavery, and other inventions that made it possible for the south to directly trade with other countries instead of going through the north and then it was this big thing because the north didn't want the south to be independent because they wanted to get money and business from the south so they resulted to giving the south many restrictions and trying to take away their slave but the south wasn't going to stand for this because the borth had slaves too and the southerners thought they were doing a lot better before the northerners tried to get all up in their space so they left like, " bye, bye don't need you" anyways it was like this big deal and crazy things started happening and the all of a sudden they went to war with each other (woah who saw that coming am I right:/) and tada long story short the south was crushed and burnt to the ground and the southerners had no choice but to swallow their pride and come crawling back to the north with their heads between their tails and let me tell you things were never the same after that ( even today we still recognize the Mason-dixon line which was the original seperation of the Yankees and Confederates in the civil war(which wasn't rlly that simple btw)) ( but none of that was the point....ooof gotta love tangents:) anywho the north didn't want to take bake the south because people hold grudges and a lot happened that needed to be forgiven plus the south wasn't rlly sorry ( talk about last resorts am I right)
hope this helps
I'm a little rusty on my history bc I don't have a history class this semester but I gotta say a little impressed with my memory
sorry about my grammar but grammar rules don't be applying after 3:15 Ga time
The creation of the Warsaw Pact is the situation and events described in Document C as in the year 1950, many of the engineers, teachers, lawyer and skilled worker were loosing the their profession in East German.
<h3>What was happening in Germany in 1950's?</h3>
Sixty million people died in the war and extermination camps as a result of the Nazi tyranny, which plunged Europe into the abyss, spawned racial fanaticism and horrendous crimes.
Germany is divided into four zones by the victorious Allies. The western nations encourage the growth of parliamentary democracy, while the Soviet Union pushes socialism eastward.
Thus, option C, The creation of the Warsaw Pact is correct.
For further details about the Germany in the 1950, click here:
brainly.com/question/22014310
#SPJ1
The Paschal Mystery is carefully connected to thoughts approximately redemption and salvation. It refers to 4 thoughts approximately the technique that Jesus went thru to shop humanity from sin. These are his life, dying and resurrection, and sooner or later his ascension.
Ther required details about Paschal Mystery is mentioned in below paragraph.
Life - Jesus become the Son of God, who become born to the Mary and lived his lifestyles in human form.
Death - Jesus become sentenced to loss of life by crucifixion and died at the go with a purpose to shop human beings from their sins.
Resurrection - Jesus become raised from the lifeless and got here lower back to lifestyles 3 days after his crucifixion.
Ascension - Jesus rose up to Heaven after having been resurrected.
The Paschal Mystery teaches that living, death and growing are part of their revel in as Christians. It reminds that there can be instances after they warfare and are in ache however that, in the event that they observe Jesus’ teachings and feature faith, they may attain Heaven.
To learn about Paschal Mystery visit here.
brainly.com/question/11867962
#SPJ4
Answer: First, Montesquieu thought that the primary exercise of powers could durably be divided only where those powers differed in kind. Second, Montesquieu failed to recognize the lawmaking character of executive and judicial exposition of existing law.
Explanation:
