<h2>I hope right the answers </h2><h2 />
Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.
Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.
Thermal because you have to melt rocks for rocks to become other types of rocks.
When an adolescent's newly sophisticated metacognitive capability causes him or her to become self-absorbed and believe that the world is focused on only him or her, this is called <u>b) adolescent egocentrism</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Adolescent egocentrism is the term used by psychologist to describe the incapability of young people to differentiate between their perception of what people think about them and what others actually think in reality.
The adolescent egocentrism concept was expressed by the psychologist David Elkind. Adolescent egocentrism is found in children of age 10-14 years. They always think about what others will think about them. The young people consider themselves as center of attention and never focus on others views.
