<h2>
Answer: The third one (Good summaries provide all the data an author uses for support.)</h2>
EXPLANATIONS:
"Good summaries include the writer's opinion on the article." This one isn't correct, because writer's opinions don't matter in summaries. That's like putting your own opinion in your own summary. It's not an important part.
"Good summaries focus on the support details from the body" Support details are for when you're writing the main idea. For summaries, you're just summarizing up what the text says, in some of your own words.
"Good summaries provide all the data an author uses for support." Yes, Summaries provide data an author used for support. Like I said earlier, summaries are the summarized version of what the text says. So basically, you don't want to add boring, un-needed data/details. Use the important data/details the author used.
"Good summaries objectively restate the thesis and crucial details." This is definitely incorrect. Theses (plural form of thesis) are statements that include your opinion. You'd most likely need to use a thesis in an argumentative essay. Also, crucial details are facts to support your thesis. You wouldn't be needing these in your summary.
Answer:
The interaction between George and Hazel develop Kurt Vonnegut's social criticism, it shows how technology can dehumanize and desensitize people.
Explanation:
My friend has strong mathmatic and English capabilities
Answer and Explanation:
Since the story mainly covers romance and love that is why Bernard and Lenina have some expectations with each other. Lenina wants Bernard to be quick and responsive in the relationship while Bernard on the other hand is very rationale. When Lenina asks Bernard to love her all the day and not wait for tomorrow, Bernard replies that 200 repetitive acts of romance from 1400 o clock to 16:30 o clock twice in a week without being rationale is not the correct way to love each other.