1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vikentia [17]
3 years ago
8

What were some of the drawbacks of being a sharecropper in the years after the Civil War?

History
1 answer:
spayn [35]3 years ago
7 0
<span>Sharecropping is a risky venture for both the sharecropper and the farmer. Just to be clear, the large farmer leases some of his land on speculation to a smaller farmer in return for part of the potential profits after harvest. If it's a good crop, both do OK. If there's a crop failure, or the market is down come autumn, both are SOL. The sharecropper's farm was small enough that he couldn't possibly get rich, unless some miracle happened in the market, but he had all to lose. And farming has never been easy work.</span>
You might be interested in
Why did the Vietnam war last so long
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

america wouldnt give up

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which issue was addressed in the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850?
Eddi Din [679]

A. balance of free states and slave states

Explanation:

  • The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was very important for various reasons. The compromise itself resolved, for the time being, the dispute over where slavery should and could exist in recently acquired Louisiana territory. He urged that slavery did not exist above the 36 ° 30 'longitude. The exception was Missouri, which entered the Union in 1820 as a slave state under compromise.
  • In addition to Missouri, Maine also entered the Union as a free state (formerly part of Massachusetts) to balance the number of free and slave states in the nation. This seeks to achieve equality of slaves and free states, along with a balance in Congress.
  • The Compromise of 1850 was a set of laws passed in Congress that sought to address the issue of slavery, which soon divided the nation.
  • The legislation was highly controversial and passed only after a long series of battles on Capitol Hill. It was destined to be unpopular, as almost every part of the nation found something that disliked its provisions.
  • Yet the 1850 compromise served its purpose.  It kept the Union apart for a while, and essentially delayed the outbreak of the Civil War for a decade.

Learn more on Missouri Compromise on

brainly.com/question/1326760

brainly.com/question/8140181

brainly.com/question/8087161

#learnwithBrainly

4 0
3 years ago
Describe why the need for raw materials led to further state expansion.
Alexus [3.1K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The need for raw materials led to further state expansion, following the Manifested Destiny that was the belief for many Americans that God's will was for America to expand its territories. After the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, US President ordered the Lewis & Clark expedition to the new Western territories. When the exédition was over, those explorers went to Washington D.C. to inform the President about the results. That is when Jefferson authorized people to settle those territories, work the land, and exploit the many raw materials and natural resources to get a profit.

4 0
3 years ago
Which best explains how the change by Palestinians from violence to negotiation affected their case for independence?
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

A) It made the case stronger by showing that Palestinians were willing to live peacefully alongside Israelis.

Explanation:

The Israeli-Palestinian clash is one of the world's longest-running and most controversial conflicts. At its heart, it is a contention between two self-determination movements— the Jewish Zionist task and the Palestinian national project— that make a case for a similar region. In any case, it is thus, a great deal more confounded than that, with apparently every reality and chronicled detail little and extensive contested by the opposite sides and their defenders.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or false ? about 75 colonists were in the colonies in 1660
KATRIN_1 [288]
I think it is false because there was 13 colonies and 75 doesnt go into 13.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which describes a difference between the duties of a house members and the duties of Senate members
    10·1 answer
  • Why was operation Barbarossa a direct violation to the Nazi-soviet non aggression pact?
    13·1 answer
  • He was the British general that was defeated at Yorktown to signify the end (and loss) of the Revolutionary War.
    5·2 answers
  • In the 1850’s the phrase “Bleeding Kansas” was used to describe clashes between
    5·1 answer
  • Help asap
    5·2 answers
  • The constitutional principles of checks and balances is exemplified by
    8·1 answer
  • Who was the 23rd prisedent
    13·2 answers
  • the attitude of respect and the devotion to ones family observed in chinese society especially in the imperil are is known as
    12·1 answer
  • Why do Filipinos have to pay taxes for Spaniards?
    13·2 answers
  • Write a divisob problem that has the quotient of 5/8
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!