1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Keith_Richards [23]
3 years ago
8

Explain how these judicial powers of the president differ: reprieve, pardon, clemency, commutation, and amnesty.

History
1 answer:
mixer [17]3 years ago
4 0
Reprieve- Abandon or postpone plans to close or put an end to
Pardon- The action of being forgiven of forgiving for an error or offense Clemency- Mercy, lenience
Commutation- Action of commuting a judicial sentence
Amnesty- An official pardon for people who have been convicted of political offenses 
You might be interested in
Toussaint L’Ouverture and José de San Martín
PIT_PIT [208]
(1) leading independence movements is your answer, I'm pretty sure. 
8 0
3 years ago
Pls help! will give brainliest! this is timed so pls try to hurry! <3
sveta [45]

The answer should be A: to outlaw monopolies.

8 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me
pickupchik [31]
It is true hpe this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the Articles of Confederation, on whom did the Confederation Congress rely to enforce its laws?
xz_007 [3.2K]

<em>A.  Individual states.</em>

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution for the United States. They were known for being very weak and giving little to no power to the government, only to the states. Under the Articles, the government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, draft soldiers, and other important aspects of what a government needs to do.

Since most of the power went to the states, it was very hard to do anything. The Confederation Congress relied on the states in order to enforce any laws and 9 out of 13 of the states had to agree with it.

Eventually, people started to realize how the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good and was potentially harming the country. The people who believed in this and wanted to amend the Articles were called Federalists. On the other hand, people who were in support of the Articles and wanted the power to be in the hands of the states were called Anti-Federalists.

When the<em> Constitutional Convention of 1787</em> was called, the original goal was to amend the Articles of Confederation. This did not happen though. The Articles actually ended up getting scrapped altogether and the United States Constitution was created instead.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are Native Americans portrayed in history?
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
They are portrayed as savages, that lost their land to conquering Europeans and that what they tried to do they regret not achieving.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is the ganges river important to india?
    7·1 answer
  • The poll tax, which was an effective tool used by white segregationists to keep African-Americans from voting in the South from
    13·1 answer
  • “ Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of G
    12·2 answers
  • The reign or the Gupta Empire was known as India's 1 Golden age 2 Reign of Culture 3 Era of Security 4 Trade Age
    12·2 answers
  • Which three factors led to the cilvil war
    10·2 answers
  • How did the British transform India's economy
    5·1 answer
  • Which step did president john adams take to strenthen the federal goverment ?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the sinking of a British ship move American to war?
    15·1 answer
  • Why were Texans supportive of Santa Anna in the civil war in Mexico?
    12·1 answer
  • Though ruled by ethnic Turks, the Ottoman Empire's majority population was:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!