Answer:
You have a choice of B. or D.
I will go with D.
Explanation:
hope it's correct
Answer and Explanation:
The opportunity cost of megan for making pizza would be equivalent to the root amount as she make 1 pizza in 3 hours and in 5 hours she produced 1 boot beer so in one hour she produced 1 by 5th So for 3 hours it produced 3 by 5 so the opportunity cost would be 3 by 5 root beer gallon
Likewise for susan it produced 4 by 8 i..e 1 by 2 root beer gallons
By the above calculation the megan has the absolute advantage as megan takes lesser hours i.e. 3 hours while susan takes 4 hours
And, the susan has the comparative advantage as it contains the less opportunity cost i.e 1 by 2 as compared with megan i.e. 3 by 5
Also in the case of trade off susan would trade away as she has the comparative advantage
The highest price would be better off by 3 by 5 gallon
And, the lowest price is 1 by 2
Answer:
$254,100
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of direct materials used in production is shown below:
= Direct materials purchased + Beginning raw materials inventory - Ending raw materials inventory - Indirect materials requisitioned and used
= $254,000 + $12,000 - $7,900 - $4,000
= $254,100
Hence, all the other information is not considered. Therefore, ignored it
Answer:
Option C (perfectly elastic demand) seems to be the correct alternative.
Explanation:
- Large companies manufacture similar products which cannot be separated from those manufactured by certain rivals.
- Price increases become decided on the market as well as firm price changes, marketing their production at either the current market value. Increasing organizations face a relatively elastic consumer surplus equivalent to something like the sale value.
All other alternatives in question are not relevant to the unique scenario. But that's the correct answer above.
The reason why Reebok believes that Sidney Crosby wearing their ice-skates will increase sales is due to Classical Conditioning.
<h3>How will classical conditioning increase sales?</h3>
Classical conditioning leads to people associating a certain stimulus with a certain effect.
Classical conditioning would therefore lead to people associating Reebok to Sidney Crosby and so they will buy more skates because of this association.
Find out more on classical conditioning at brainly.com/question/17583598
#SPJ1
