The correct answer is Walking over land bridges, i took the test.
Answer:
After people were asked not to sit in the seat behind the drivers in honor of Rosa Parks' fight for the Civil Rights movement, some people did actually sit in that seat. Making the assumption that these people were prejudiced or racist is an example of the correspondence bias.
Explanation:
On December 1st, 1955, Rosa Parks was commuting back home by bus, when the driver asked her and three other African Americans to stand up from their seats so that white passengers could seat there. While the three other passengers complied with the driver's order, Rosa Parks denied to do so, which ended up with her arrest, and later on with a social movement that decided to boycott the buses in Montgomery during Rosa Parks' trial. Although most of the people decided to leave the first seat behind the driver empty in honor of Rosa Parks, some of them actually seat on it anyways. Assuming that these people were racists is an example of a correspondence bias. A correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a person's personality based on a unique and specific observed behavior. There are many circumstances and reasons as to why that people sat on the seat that was meant to be empty that would not make them instantly perceived as racist or prejudiced, but assuming that they are based on that one action would be an example of a correspondence bias.
D. it has a very limited supply of natural resources
Answer:
They believed that communism was too totalitarian and wouldn't let people choose government. 2) The U.S. is a capitalist country, and so its prosperity depends on having people buy its products all over the world. In communist countries, there is no private property, so it cuts people off from buying products.
Explanation:
They believed that communism was too totalitarian and wouldn't let people choose government. 2) The U.S. is a capitalist country, and so its prosperity depends on having people buy its products all over the world. In communist countries, there is no private property, so it cuts people off from buying products.
Answer:
Yes exploration was worth it
Explanation:
The era of exploration was a period of new discovery.
Even though this era came with several negative changes such as spread of diseases, slavery, imperialism, loss of land. It also has a lot of positives which in my opinion justifies this era.
The discovery that was made during the period of exploration had tremendous effect on economic, social and political situations in many areas of the world. Trade and industry experienced a tremendous growth, ideas were birthed and exchanged as well as technology, plants and animals. Also there was the discovery of new routes, like routes to India and the americas. This age brought about advances in navigation which was used by future travellers.
Thank you!