In real life give them something they want or you make something thats special
If you mean brainly two people need to answer your question in order to give brainlest and then at the top it says give brainlest
Answer:
D. Churchill's matter-of-fact delivery makes it seem as though he is disinterested in the subject.
Explanation:
The Finest Hour was one of the memorable speeches by Winston Churchill' on 18th June 1940, the speech was to brace up Britain’s resolve during the dark days. The speech was delivered during World War 2. In his speech, he appealed to the logic and emotions of the people of the United Kingdom giving them hope in the coming fight.
Answer: sorry haven’t played it, but, I’ll look into it
Explanation: Thanks for the points, have a great day!! :D
Answer:
The option which best explains how the historical passage might enhance a reader's understanding of the personal narrative is:
B. The historical passage connects the personal experience of planting and harvesting corn with technical information about farming.
Explanation:
We can easily eliminate option A because the passage does not show evidence of why the Wampanoag were once hunter-gatherers. Quite the opposite, instead of gathering they are farming in the passage.
Letter C claims that the story told by the grandfather is more factual. Looking this passage up online, I found the previous lines. The grandfather is actually telling a sort of fantastic story involving Mother Earth and the prairie rabbit. We can also eliminate this option.
Letter D claims that the passage is about modern technology and how it changed the Wampanoag's relationship with their harvest. However, the passage does not mention technology at all.
The best option then seems to be letter B. While the grandfather is talking about his experience with planting and farming, the narrator is describing it in more technical details: the types of crops that were sowed together and why.
Answer:
The main disagreement between Susan Baker and John Denver was about placing a warning label on music products inappropriate for younger children due to explicit sexual or violent lyrics while John Denver did not support any censorship of any kind on music released.
Explanation:
Firstly, John Denver, a Folk-rock musician, was strongly opposed to censorship of any kind in the society or anywhere else in the world and that in his experience censors often misinterpret music, as was the case in one of his songs.
Secondly, John Denver believed that censoring is counter productive, in that the more people are prevented from doing something the more curious they are to try to do it. In essence, he said that which is denied becomes that which is desired, and that thing that is hidden becomes the most interesting to search for.
