1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vitek1552 [10]
3 years ago
10

Why would a country want to limit the number of parties in its system?

History
1 answer:
kvv77 [185]3 years ago
7 0
To limit the amount of power. Parties are composed of people, usually people who consider their party to be the best. However with too much power in one party causes anarchy and chaos therefore allowing more segues for corruption and abuse of systems. Therefore when the system of power is abused or overused it takes funds that some governments don't have to fix the issues created.
You might be interested in
Which one is correct A, B, C or D and please be sure ​
spayn [35]
The answer is C for coochie
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the events that took place during real life west
Rudiy27

The late nineteenth century saw the finish of the "old west." By the 1880s, the Transcontinental Railroad associated all America from Pacific to Atlantic. The railroad spoke to the new period of industry.  

While in the American east as of now, life could be to some degree effectively characterized by where one lived, in the west it was a blended pack. All its domain had been vanquished, and there started to rapidly build up a wistfulness for pre-settlement times. This was misused by Buffalo Bill's voyaging Wild West Show, where old west scenes were re-authorized with genuine cattle rustlers and Indians.  

Numerous Indians disliked the happening to the railroad since they realized it meant the happening to increasingly white men, settlements and laws constrained upon them. They had valid justification for disdain on the grounds that so far each arrangement they made with American government had been broken.  

With respect to slaves, Emancipation had won them their opportunity, however regardless they had numerous deterrents held up for them by southern states, most residents of which would not think about blacks as equivalent natives. In spots, for example, Kansas and Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma), numerous blacks appreciated a greater number of opportunities than somewhere else in the nation and framed either all-dark towns or lived in socially blended ones. Their real worry as of now was winning the privilege to cast a ballot and a decent instruction.  

Towns developed rapidly, once in a while medium-term, likewise with the Oklahoma Land Run in 1889.  

Most ladies pioneers in these new settlements invested all their energy in cooking and clothing. It was a significantly more colossal errand than many may envision it to be today. Truth be told, students went through pieces of their day assisting with these, while the young men did likewise with tending yields and steeds, hacking kindling, and different things they'd all probably do as grown-ups.  

In many spots, Indians continued losing their territory. Most either were moved to reservations, fled to Canada or Mexico, or kicked the bucket either battling for their property or just to will not abandon it.  

A considerable lot of the opportunities appreciated by previous slaves in parts of the south blurred quick as Jim Crow laws spread westbound, while in the meantime a large number of them were likewise impacting the world forever as "firsts" inside government, legislative issues, workmanship, writing, science and the military.  

To move to and live in the west as of now, in the case of having gone by rail or stagecoach or steamboat, was a mind-blowing danger. It implied losing the security offered by extensive populaces encompassed by common foundations. It implied introduction to visit flare-ups of infection on the fields, for example, cholera and flu. It implied risk every step of the way. Criminals were all over, the same number of men who came were getting away from their wrongdoings back home.  

The westbound extension by bold and gutsy homesteading families, especially by the 1880s, is the thing that truly made America a mainland country. They went first, at that point the administration pursued; and after that inevitably came the unified statehood of all the land they'd followed.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the Ethnologue?
storchak [24]
The Ethnologue is an encyclopedic reference work cataloging all of the world’s 7,105 known living languages
4 0
2 years ago
What is common sense
EastWind [94]
Common sense is sound of practical judgment that is independent of specialized knowledge, training, or the like; normal native intelligence. <span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following describe a difference between how the british east india company operated in mughal india and how the dut
irina [24]

Answer:

The British negotiated treaties with local Indian rulers, while the Dutch established control through conquest and colonization.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • NEED ASAP!!!!! PLEASE HELP Using the map, which river is also an important political feature and why?
    13·1 answer
  • What position did serfs have in feudal society?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the Georgia colony founded?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was john t scopes
    10·2 answers
  • How did geography influence settlement patterns in the first English colonies?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the USSR refuse Marshall Aid?
    9·1 answer
  • Federalism is best defined as a principle of goverment that
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Spanish-American War help create support for building the Panama Canal?
    14·1 answer
  • I need HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • The system of slavery in Greece A. permitted slaves to buy their freedom. B. forbade masters from mistreating and neglecting the
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!