Both moral reasoning and moral reflection yield conclusions about what should or should not done; these conclusions are called moral judgements
Our ability to make decisions based on logic or on intuition both play a role in judgment. To evaluate situations, actions, people, behavior, etc., one makes moral judgments, which are judgments with a moral underpinning.
According to some, moral judgments are frequently founded on intuition or feeling, which is typically connected to the emotions. This theory of moral judgment holds that conscious thought has no bearing on the moral conclusion.
Moral judgments, according to intuitionists, are often connected to emotions and are based on intuition or feeling. Numerous sources of evidence are cited by intuitionists to bolster their viewpoint.
As an illustration, moral judgments frequently involve moral reasoning that occurs "after the fact." As a result, we frequently make moral decisions hastily and based solely on our initial impressions.
Learn more about moral judgments here
brainly.com/question/15392471
#SPJ4
Hola amanda also sorry it’s taking forever i swear this works so don’t give up
Answer:
Kassandra can u plz mark me as brainliest
becoz I needed it very much
Answer:
This is an example of marginal analysis, as the decisions made by Raphael are on margin.
Explanation:
The decision of Raphael about pool versus bike time is totally a "how-much decision". It is clear that pool time and bike time can both reduce the time for race. However, the efficiency of pool time is high currently, and hence there is much sense in trying to spend more time in the pool and less on bike. This however makes no sense that all the time is spent in the pool and no time biking. Raphael only intends to alter the number of hours spend on each activity at the margin.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
it's a. the study of mental processes and behavior.
