The best option would be that "metal knives" would not have <span>been available during the Neolithic period, since this was past the stone age, when the other items would have been readily available. </span>
Hello. This question is incomplete. The complete question is:
"Few historians would dispute that the market revolution brought substantial material benefits to most northeasterners, urban and rural....
Which of the following pieces of historical evidence from the United States census could best be used to support the argument in the excerpt?
Answer:
The best evidence that would support this argument would be statistical data showing the benefits created for these groups through the market revolution.
Explanation:
As you may already know, statistical data is a set of information that was raised as a conclusion of surveys that constitute the country's census for certain factors in society. As these data are obtained through well-structured and established research, they present themselves as the best evidence to support arguments about the effects and factors that a group of people was subjected to due to different systems. An example of this can be seen in the question above, where the presentation of statistical data would justify the author's statement.
The Ohio, Tennessee, and Columbia rivers
I believe it is <span>B native Americans shifted from hunting and gathering to acquiring animal hides for trade. Because of process of elimination:
not A because natives did use European technology such as guns, and adapted to using horses and other livestock
not C because natives did not adapt European customs, just the items they received during the Columbian Exchange (not a cultural exchange)
not D because natives died as a result of European diseases, therefore the Europeans did not aid in curing those diseases but rather caused them</span>
The past tense, key word "history"