1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zepler [3.9K]
3 years ago
8

Have you ever had an experience when you couldn't understand what someone was saying due to their poor diction? How did you over

come it? Do you ever use poor diction? When are you truly careful with your diction?
English
1 answer:
uysha [10]3 years ago
6 0
Yes, I have had that experience. I overcame it by asking what they meant. It hurt me, but when I asked them what they meant they stopped. Now we are friends. We go everywhere together. We have parties, sleepovers, and movie nights. Once I have used poor diction on accident. The person I used it on never forgave me. I am very sorry about that right now. From that moment, I have been careful with my diction. Whenever I think of saying a poor diction, I stop and think, should I, or should I just keep quiet. I always choose to keep quiet, so that I don't hurt someone's feelings.
You might be interested in
Explain how the author's choice in ordering the events in the passage develop the plot of the story. Be sure to use specific det
pentagon [3]
Can u show the passage?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are Logical Fallacies<br><br><br> in your own words. don't lookup google definition
quester [9]

Answer:

A logical fallacy is a mistaken belief to the effect that inferences having a certain structure are valid. Put another way,  a logical fallacy is a belief in the legitimacy of what is in fact an illegitimate rule of inference.  As the examples below indicate, logical fallacies are sometimes a reflection of mere prejudice and in other cases they embody actual ratiocinative  shortcomings.

Explanation:

Here are some examples:

(1) People will often accept what people in authority, even if the data clearly indicates that they're wrong. If an economist from Harvard weighs in on an issue and homeless person weighs in on that same issue, the economist will be believed and the homeless person will be ridiculed, even if the data makes it very clear that the homeless person is right. (This is known as the 'fallacy of authority.' )

(2) People tend judge others by their words, not their deeds, with the result that a grouchy person who does good is seen as evil, whereas an evil person who pays lip-service to virtue is seen as good.

(3) People assume that what they are not familiar with is impossible. Smith says that his girlfriend has symptoms XYZ and Jones, not having ever personally seen anybody exhibiting those symptoms, refuses on that basis alone to believe Jones.

(4) People have some tendency to assume that entailments are 'convertible', i.e. that if q follows from p, then p also follows from q ('if Smith was decapitated, then he died; so given that he died, he must have been decapitated'). This known as 'affirming the consequent.'        

(5) It is assumed that confirmation is transitive, i.e. that if p confirms q and q confirms r, then p confirms. But this is not so. Smith's being a crime boss is evidence of his having considerable, and Smith's having considerable wealth is evidence of his having some kind of legitimate employment; but Smith's being a crime boss is not evidence of his having legitimate employment.

When people commit fallacies 1-3, their doing so tends to have an emotional basis; they want to believe that authority-figures are good people, that people are honest, and that what is strange is impossible. When people commit fallacies 4 and 5, their doing is less a reflection of emotionally rooted prejudices than of sheer lack of acumen. In any case, all of these fallacies are routinely committed.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He could feel the hot sun on his neck like a hot paw.
mario62 [17]

Answer:

Personification

Explanation:

As the name implies, personification is when something is written to sound like a person. The sun doesn't actually have any paws but is likened to a living thing.

7 0
3 years ago
Alliteration in ozymandais
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

Cold command

Stone stand

Survive stamped

King of kings

Colossal Wreck

Boundless and bare

Explanation:

Alliteration is the use of the same letter or sound at the beginning of words that are close together

have a nice day and mark me brainliest! :)

4 0
3 years ago
Conclusion made in the basis of unstated or stated evidence are called_____
Nata [24]
The answer is B. Inferences.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was one major source of conflict during the civil rights movement of the 1940s and 1950s
    15·2 answers
  • For all of my life, I have been a jogger. I first ran the Peachtree Road Race, a famous 10-kilometer race in Atlanta, __________
    9·2 answers
  • The media doesn't influence me, but my sister's friends are clearly very much influenced. They always wear the latest fashions!"
    5·1 answer
  • Why are divergent plate boundaries called constructive
    10·2 answers
  • Which word means to see over others,or be in charge
    14·2 answers
  • Technology has changed the lives of young people essay​
    11·2 answers
  • Which was the largest group in the colonies in the years leading up to the American Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • Should “free speech” mean you can say anything to anyone? Give an example of when that attitude would be dangerous or a bad idea
    8·1 answer
  • 2. Which concepts from the text are most convincing to you? Which do you find less convincing? Overall, do you agree with Carl R
    13·1 answer
  • Readers can conclude that the speaker in "The Village Blacksmith" by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, believes that the blacksmith's
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!