The Puritans who settled the Massachusetts Bay Colony wanted their settlement to be primarily
an example to the rest of the world.Territory claimed but never administered by the colonial government extended as far west as the Pacific Ocean. The earlier Dutch colony of New Netherlands disputed many of these claims, arguing that they held rights to lands beyond Rhode Island up to the western side of Cape Cod and the Plymouth Bay Colony.
It’s the scape of the land
Here is what I found:
he Foraker Act, Pub.L. 56–191, 31 Stat. 77, enacted April 12, 1900, officially known as the <span>Organic Act of 1900</span>, is a United States federal law that established civilian (albeit limited popular) government on the island of Puerto Rico, which had recently become a possession of the United States as a result of the Spanish–American War. Section VII of the Foraker Act also established Puerto Rican citizenship.[1] President William McKinley signed the act on April 12, 1900[2] and it became known as the Foraker Act after its sponsor, Ohio Senator Joseph B. Foraker. Its main author has been identified as Secretary of War Elihu Root.
The new government had a governor and an 11-member executive council appointed by the President of the United States, a House of Representatives with 35 elected members, a judicial system with a Supreme Court and a United States District Court, and a non-voting Resident Commissioner in Congress.
The Executive council was all appointed: five individuals were selected
from Puerto Rico residents while the rest were from those in top
cabinet positions, including attorney general and chief of police (also
appointed by the President). The Insular Supreme Court was also
appointed. In addition, all federal laws of the United States were to be
in effect on the island. The first civil governor of the island under
the Foraker Act was Charles H. Allen, inaugurated on May 1, 1900 in San Juan, Puerto Rico. This law was superseded in 1917 by the Jones–Shafroth Act.
Answer:
<h2>Brainiest me</h2>
Explanation:
The debate has been lively since the Scots voted 55 percent to 45 percent against dissolving their 307-year-old union with England. Some commentators have pointed to the strong showing of the Scottish separatists as another manifestation, different but nonetheless alarming, of a revival of nationalism across Europe that has spawned populist and anti-European Union, anti-immigration parties like the United Kingdom Independence Party or the National Front in France. Yet the Scots, like the Ukrainians, or the Catalans, are in many ways the opposite of the anti-E.U. forces. Many of their activists were inspired by the example of a country like Slovakia, which broke away from a larger state but now enjoys the free-trade benefits of the European Union and membership in NATO.
