1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
9

How did the londan underground railway become a huge sucess?explain?

History
1 answer:
asambeis [7]3 years ago
8 0
<u>London Underground Railway was a huge success because of the following reasons I'm telling you ---</u>
1. The <u>population</u> of London <u>increased</u> dramatically because many people migrated from villages to the city in search of work.
2. People of the city were <u>accommodated outside the city</u> in family cottages, while the <u>industrial places</u> where they worked were <u>located on the inside</u> of London.
3. Some form of transport was needed so that people could commute from home to work and back home, and the Underground Railway helped in that a lot, because it was the only mode of transport which <u>carried a large number of people in a short span of time</u>.
4. Although the railway was discouraged earlier because people complained of suffocation, it became a huge success because it was <u>the only way of connecting their homes with their workplace</u>.
Hope I helped!
If there is anything more you want to ask related to this, just comment here I will be glad to help! :)
You might be interested in
How many days of the alamo lasted
garik1379 [7]

The Alamo (or the Battle of the Alamo) lasted 13 days.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The bicameral nature of the the us federal legislature is responsible for:
artcher [175]

Answer:

The bicameral nature of the U.S. Federal legislature is responsible for (D) The presence of both an upper and lower chamber of Congress.

Explanation:

This system serve as a form of check and balances that limit the power of the legislative branch of the government.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What goods might the trader have brought back to Caesarea from rome
Vinvika [58]
The port city of Caesarea, which served as a capital city of the Roman province of Judea, would have displayed the trading of goods from around the world including the Roman Empire, Asia, India, China, and Arabia. Goods moving through the city could have included silk, luxury spices such as pepper, ginger, and cinnamon, or olive oil and fish sauce. Other items being transported from Caesarea to Rome for the most wealthy families might have also included marble, fine pottery, jewelry, and perfumes. 
4 0
3 years ago
What do ethnic groups have in common?
sammy [17]

Ethnic group is that group of people who are known for having a common characteristic. Their common characteristic is only because of the culture or the inheritance that they have been through. Ethnicity is defines as the common cultural identity that the people of these group have.

6 0
3 years ago
How was machiavelli a humanist?
zubka84 [21]

Answer:Machiavelli’s realism

Niccolò Machiavelli, whose work derived from sources as authentically humanistic as those of Ficino, proceeded along a wholly opposite course. A throwback to the chancellor-humanists Salutati, Bruni, and Poggio, he served Florence in a similar capacity and with equal fidelity, using his erudition and eloquence in a civic cause. Like Vittorino and other early humanists, he believed in the centrality of historical studies, and he performed a signally humanistic function by creating, in La mandragola (1518; The Mandrake), the first vernacular imitation of Roman comedy. His unswerving concentration on human weakness and institutional corruption suggests the influence of Boccaccio; and, like Boccaccio, he used these reminders less as topical satire than as practical gauges of human nature. In one way at least, Machiavelli is more humanistic (i.e., closer to the classics) than the other humanists, for while Vittorino and his school ransacked history for examples of virtue, Machiavelli (true to the spirit of Polybius, Livy, Plutarch, and Tacitus) embraced all of history—good, evil, and indifferent—as his school of reality. Like Salutati, though perhaps with greater self-awareness, Machiavelli was ambiguous as to the relative merits of republics and monarchies. In both public and private writings—especially the Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio (1531; Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy)—he showed a marked preference for republican government, but in The Prince (1532) he developed, with apparent approval, a model of radical autocracy. For this reason, his goals have remained unclear.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Medicare and medicaid were part of the system developed during the new deal. True or false
    9·1 answer
  • Where were conditions best for enslaved African Americans in 1862?
    15·1 answer
  • Turkic slave soldiers in Egypt were called _____.
    6·1 answer
  • What was the name of the series of laws put in place to encourage the 13 English colonies to trade with England
    7·1 answer
  • How does garibaldi manifesto turn the war for unification in southern italy into a popular campaign how does garibaldi portray t
    8·1 answer
  • What did the monarchs give the lords in ancient rome
    8·1 answer
  • What is a “strong and natural” proof that god never wanted us to stay with Britain
    11·1 answer
  • Which political idea was influenced by this provision of the Magna Carta?
    7·1 answer
  • How does the treaty of Versailles change the geography of Germany?
    7·2 answers
  • Write out the rhythm of each sentence. Remember to use the da for stressed syllables and the ta for unstressed syllables. Upload
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!