Answer:
here!
Explanation:
goals: "Proclamation of 1763, proclamation declared by the British crown at the end of the French and Indian War in North America, mainly intended to conciliate the Native Americans by checking the encroachment of settlers on their lands."
goals: "The Quartering Act of 1765 required the colonies to house British soldiers in barracks provided by the colonies. If the barracks were too small to house all the soldiers, then localities were to accommodate the soldiers in local inns, livery stables, ale houses, victualling houses and the houses of sellers of wine."
hope this helps youu! :)
Answer:
d
Explanation:
i believe they were counted as a 3/5 of a person vote I THINK I BELIEVE
Eisenhower’s National Interstate and Defense Highways Act resulted in construction of 41,000 miles long highway, and it led to economic growth and many other benefits to the United States.
<h3>
What is Eisenhower’s National Interstate and
Defense Highways Act?</h3>
This act authorized one of the biggest public works project in the US history by building national highways signed by Eisenhower in 1956. The act authorized to built 41,000 miles long highway and budget allocated was $25 billion which was supposed to be complete in 10 years.
The interstate highway system had positive influence on the economic growth of the country, lead to reduction of traffic deaths and injuries, provided substantial benefits to users, and was an important factor in the nation's defense.
Therefore, it can be said that National Interstate and Defense Highways Act led to construction of 41,000 miles long highway and provided social, political, economic benefits to the United States.
Learn more about Eisenhower’s National Interstate and Defense Highways Act here:
brainly.com/question/22467961
This question seems to be incomplete. However, there´s enough information to find the right answer.
I understand that this flag has serious important meanings . . . But that does not mean that . . . people may not under the First Amendment show their feelings by what Texas calls desecration of a venerated object. I think it's a most important case. I sense that it goes to the heart of the First Amendment, to hear things or to see things that we hate test the First Amendment more than seeing or hearing things that we like. It wasn't designed for things we like. They never needed a First Amendment.
—William M. Kunstler, Attorney for Gregory Lee Johnson, Texas v. Johnson
Use the drop-down menu to complete the sentence.
In this excerpt, attorney William Kunstler is arguing against his client's conviction.
The main idea of this excerpt is that the First Amendment is essential because it
Answer: allows for symbolic speech
Explanation:
After Gregory Lee Johnson, William Kunstler´s client, was tried and convicted for having burned an American flag to protest against Reagan´s government, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and the case was sent to the Supreme Court. The Texas v. Johnson court case brought up the question of whether or not the desecration of an American flag is a form of speech protected under the First Amendment. The court ruled that Johnson burning the flag was a form of expression with a distinctively political nature and was protected by the First Amendment.
