1. You really ought to have not told her that I was leaving.
2. You should know better than to rig he your PIN on your credit card.
Answer:
D). Rule; Issue; Analysis.
Explanation:
The three correct words to complete the given statement and accomplish its meaning appropriately. The final statement reads as:
"From this analysis, a <u>rule</u> can be made as to whether or not the <u>issue</u> applies to the <u>analysis</u>."
<u>As per the IRAC(Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) method, the given laws are applied to the facts associated with the issue in order to analyse if it is applicable to the issue for bringing a resolution by reaching a conclusion</u>. Thus, the rule can be developed that if the issue justifies the analysis or application. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
The option that describes a deconstructionist approach to a text is - complicates the meaning of the text. Deconstructionists like to dig deep into the text, and find meanings that aren’t obvious at the first, second, or even the third glance. They like to analyze texts so much that they bear everything within their interpretation, and get to the very core of the text, thus complicating something that would otherwise have been a simple analysis.
It would be irony, because the actions contradict each other severely.<span />
