-4 I believe I’m not sure tho
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer:
Below.
Step-by-step explanation:
One is (x - 3)^3.
The graph of the parent function x^3 rises from the lower left quadrant and there is a point of inflection through (0, 0), then it rises to the right in the first quadrant.
The graph of (x - 3)^3 is the translation of the graph of x^3, 3 units to the right. It will pass through the x-axis at (3, 0).
70% of the Jerseys are medium-sized.
If you wanna know how I got my answer then just ask. :)
Hope this helped!
Answer: D. -40x^3 + 25x^2 + 45x
Step-by-step explanation:
-5x(8x^2 - 5x - 9)
-40x^3 + 25x^2 + 45x
