Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Manorialism helped the two nobles and laborers by utilizing an exceptional framework. This framework is the point at which the ruler got sustenance and work in return for his security.
Manorialism is where a ruler of the house would make the serfs or inhabitants take a shot at his domain or fief. The medieval times arrangement of manorialism was the association of a nation economy and society. Laborers had rights to utilize the land and space keeping in mind the end goal to live.
B, continued to experience racism and segregation.
C because muslim women were treated as the lowest class in their society
