Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
According to Hofstede's
Model of Culture, individualism is a worldview that societies value
personal freedom and self-expression and adhere to the principle that people
should be judged by their personal achievements rather than by their social
background.
Individualism <span>is the moral stance, political philosophy, ideology, or social outlook
that emphasizes the moral worth of the individual.</span>
When testing a hypothesis using a null hypothesis, you use a statement that negates your hypothesis, and, within a certain level of certainty, see if the null hypothesis can be rejected. When testing the null hypothesis, you typically want to be around 95% sure that you can reject it (confidence interval is 95%).
In Rose's case, she is testing the hypothesis that there is a correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior.
Her null hypothesis would be:
"There is not a positive correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior"
or
"The correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior is less than or equal to zero"
