Do you think Shakespeare also saw evil as stronger than the forces of good?

1 answer:

5 0

I do not think that Shakespeare sees evil as stronger than good or human understanding because in the end, Scotland is returned to her rightful king and Malcolm is an element of good in the play. Macbeth certainly is taken over by his greed and ambition, and a sense of evil gets the better of him and clouds his good judgment. However, evil overall does not reign supreme, and the audience sees the harm that evil has caused to Macbeth throughout the play. He has lost his wife, the loyalty of his subjects, and his integrity. Macbeth knows that he should grow old in the company of friends, but he acknowledges that he is now alone. So evil does not overcome good in the end--evil leaves Scotland with the beheading of Macbeth.
- hope this helps

You might be interested in

In which sentence is the underlined word or group of words would a predicate nominative

coldgirl [10]

C.) polio is a contagious *disease* that has mostly been eradicated.

5 0

3 years ago

What is one example of prose

antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

Novels, textbooks and newspaper articles are all examples of prose.

8 0

2 years ago

In “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe, what does the beating heart that the narrator hears symbolize?

kondor19780726 [428]

It represents the guilt from that person and than from all the guilt he drives himself mad.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What should a strong research plan involve and what are some ways to evaluate the sources of information you choose to use for r

fenix001 [56]

Answer:

A good research plan should include the following answers and information. Brief introduction to the research field (including relevant references) • Motivation for the topic (Why is it important?) What kinds of results are expected? (tool, framework, new theory, new technical solutions, etc.)

7 0

2 years ago

Write an argument against the motion "Students should not play politics".

Oxana [17]

Answer:

See below

Explanation:

"Students should not play politics" is a tone-deaf argument used by gatekeeping politicians who shut their doors to the struggling youth. For how many years have students complained about their schooling system, only to be turned down due to a lack of funds? When students try to participate in shaping the world, their world, they're treated like children. Students are expected to attend school full-time without being paid or publicly acknowledged. "Students should not play politics" holds little ground and defense for those who use it. What if a student is studying politics? Shouldn't they be able to use their expertise to contribute to political conversations? All inclusivity issues aside, politics will eventually become outdated if the people who run it refuse to listen to students and the younger generations. Most politicians are old and their views are outdated... why not listen to the people next in line? In conclusion, "students should not play politics" is only a restrictive, weak argument at its very core.

4 0

2 years ago