Answer:
If I were to start a business, I will choose Sole Proprietorship.
Explanation:
Reasons why I will choose Sole Proprietorship
* I will be the sole owner and responsible for my business.
* All profits (and loss) will belong to me, means the more I work harder, the more return I (alone) will get.
* I can make all the decisions by myself, without the interference of any other person.
* I can expand my business as per my convenience and hard work, if I succeed I can eat all the fruits myself.
* I can grow my business as much I want.
* No one will be my boss, I will be setting my own working hours and work load etc.
Private Employers.
The Right to know law discusses workers rights to know about dangerous chemicals/substances in the workplace and is overseen by OSHA ..
Answer:
As a part of CSR initiatives (or purely governmental), nurturing environmental beneficial factors is always a plus for the whole economy.
Decreasing pollution can further improve the tourism sector, and change property values by encouraging real estate in "green areas". Clean energy initiatives (wind and solar energy) have the ability to transform the whole energy industry, which is the input for most economy processes and businesses.
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
Answer:
There will be an increase of $6,200 , If the special order is accepted
Explanation:
For computing the net income effect first we have to find out the net income per scale which is a difference between offer purchase price and variable cost per unit
In mathematically,
Net income = Offer purchase price - variable cost per unit
where,
Offer purchase price is $35
And, the variable cost is $12 per unit plus it incur special shipping charges which is also a part of the variable cost.
So, total variable cost = variable cost per unit + Special shipping charges per scale
= $12 + $1
= $13
So, Net income is
= $15 - $13
= $2 per unit
Now for producing the 3100 scales, the net income should be multiply with the production unit
= Net income × Production unit
= 3,100 × 2
= $6,200
Fixed cost is fixed whether the production level changes or not. Thus, it is not be considered.
Hence, there will be an increase of $6,200 , If the special order is accepted
