Answer:
C) 0.0 percent
Explanation:
The net return on any investment is what we receive from the investment in addition to the purchase price paid.
In the given instance the investor pays $22.50 per share as an investment cost, to acquire such shares. Number of shares purchased = 500
Now at the end of the period the shares are sold for $21 each
Also the dividend per share received is $1.50
Thus, total return = $21 + $1.50 = $22.50 per share.
This is exact same as that of the investment price.
Thus net return = Total benefits - Cost = $22.50 - $22.50 = $0
Since net return is $0 the value of return in percentage shall also be $0.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
If you look at it I think it was be in bounds and you did not have
Answer:
the acid-test ratio is 1.5 times
Explanation:
The computation of the acid-test ratio is as follows:
Acid test Ratio = Quick assets ÷ current liabilities
where,
Quick Assets is
= Cash + short tern investments + Account receivable
= $3,500 + $50,000 + $56,000
= $109,500
And, the current liabilities is $73,000
So, the acid-test ratio is
= $109,500 ÷ $73,000
= 1.5 times
Hence, the acid-test ratio is 1.5 times
