1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
3 years ago
11

In a few sentences, explain the difference between the origins of the American Federation of Labor (AFL) and the origins of the

Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO).
History
2 answers:
steposvetlana [31]3 years ago
8 0
CIO focused on materials such as rubber and steel and they also had automobiles, The AFL was the result of two labor unions coming together to create jobs. Long story short one creates jobs and the other provides materials.
Dmitriy789 [7]3 years ago
5 0

The Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) was an organization that covered under its arms many unions. One of the differences with American Federation of Labor(AFL) is that the CIO had the affiliation of a diversity of skilled and non-skilled workers, meanwhile, the AFL based its organization by the skills of its members.

In 1935, <em>dissidents in the AFL founded the Committee for Industrial Organization.</em> Sidney Hillman and John L. Lewis were the leaders of the movement. They gained the trust of their people with important organizing victories in rubber, steel, and automobiles industries.

Today, the AML-CIO are united. The merger of 1955 reunited almost 85 unions in the U.S. Its headquarters is in Washington D.C.


You might be interested in
The Palmares kingdom was composed of escaped _____.
Stels [109]
It was composed of escaped African slaves located in Brazil, which saw internal conflict leading to its demise at the hands of the Portuguese
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the "successes" of the Age of Jackson begin to fail after he left office with his successors, Van Buren and Tyler?
Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

Because successors did not have the same egalitarian and democratic goals as Jackson.

Explanation:

Andrew Jackson developed policies that would help the most undervalued population and reduce American elitism, especially in relation to large banks and corporations. Jackson tried to extend voting rights, ending electoral college and allowing the American population to be the only one responsible for choosing their representatives, promoting programs that help farmers, promoting the rotation of public offices, preventing political elitism, preventing monopoly banking, among other very populist and democratic policies that would give more freedom and progress to American society. However, his successors did not follow these same objectives, mainly because of the political and economic pressure that the big corporations and big political names imposed, which caused the successes of the Jackson era to begin to fail.

4 0
3 years ago
What major event was Washington involved with in 1781?
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

hi

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Burke insists that the historical foundations of france were fundamentally sound, and thus the revolution of 1789 was unnecessar
Aliun [14]
If your options are: a) The competing interests of the people were institutionalized in the Estates General, generating a "reciprocal struggle" that would reconcile discordant powers, b) The monarchy, though occasionally unjust, provided stability and security, <span>c) The "discordant interests" of the various corporate bodies of France— the guilds, municipalities, nobility, and </span>
clergy— were mediated by the monarch and his officials, and <span>d) All of the above, the correct answer in my opinion is d) All of the above. Burke provides a comprehensive critique of the French revolution in all of its aspects. Even though he admits it was a remarkable event, he disagrees that it would bring about a new, more just and sound political system. Of course, the old monarchy was bad in many respects, but it didn't have to be abolished altogether. It could be fixed. Instead, monarchy was replaced by anarchy and traditions were violently dismantled.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What is a VERY good conclusion about the guns of World War 1
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

✌❤❤❤

Explanation:

That they were very useful and harmful and long

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were the conflicts of the jewish-arab
    5·1 answer
  • What was army commander John Bell Hood's plan of action at the Battle of Nashville?
    10·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·2 answers
  • Which excerpt from Last Lecture supports the idea that one can benefit from helping people? And as you get older, you may find t
    13·2 answers
  • List the characteristics of the new constitution.
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Songhai Empire promote the spread of Islam in Africa?
    9·2 answers
  • When did Norse Vikings arrive in Newfoundland?
    14·1 answer
  • How did church leaders attempt to limit the spread of Protestantism during the Catholic Reformation?
    12·1 answer
  • My stoopid dummy brother took my gummy werms and hot tumalees and now i wish he wuz ded now
    12·2 answers
  • In "enemies from within," mccarthy claims that there are many communists at the us state department. To support this claim, mcca
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!