Which branch of the government checks the power of which other branch of government by a two thirds agreement

1 answer:

3 0

It gives some power to each branch of government instead of giving all the power to one branch. 2. Legislative branch may check the executive branch by passing laws over the veto by two-thirds vote in each house.

You might be interested in

What American Indian tribe was living in the area of Georgia when the Spanish arrived in the 1 point

Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

Cherokee.

Explanation:

The Cherokee people have a long history in the Southeastern United States of Georgia. Historians documented their oral history in the 19th century that told the tribe had moved to the south from the Great Lakes area. The way of life and culture of the Native Indians in Georgia was profoundly influenced by the newcomers in the region. The native people had occupied the territory for centuries before the first European explorers appeared. The indigenous people's history was strongly affected by the Europeans who brought new traditions, concepts, beliefs, weapons, animals, and diseases with them.

3 0

3 years ago

Which phrases best describes the goals of the Englightment

Pepsi [2]

The enlightenment was a group of people who believed in science above all and explains all.

7 0

3 years ago

How did the new deal hope to stimulate industrial recovery

sweet-ann [11.9K]

1933 New Deal legislation that created the WPA, which created jobs to put people back to work right away. ... One of FDR's major New Deal programs. It was designed to boost the economy and stimulate industrial recovery through reducing unemployment and restoring the nation's purchasing power.

Hope this helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Which was not a factor of migration

BaLLatris [955]

What are your options?

3 0

3 years ago

What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods of direct democracy: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall?

Marina86 [1]

In the United States, where there is no direct democracy at the federal level, more than half of the states (and many municipalities) allow citizens to vote on initiatives, and the vast majority of states have mechanisms to promote initiatives or referendums. There are also community meetings (town meetings) and various institutions at the municipal level where citizens can interact with those responsible for administration in decision-making. The disadvantages of the initiatives is that any citizen could present it at any time and it should be analyzed and taken into account, which could take a long time.

Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.
Revocation of mandate, revocation of mandate or recall referendum (in English, recall election), is a procedure by which citizens can cease their public office to an elected official, before the end of their respective period, by direct vote or by collection of signatures, depending on the geographic or population dimensions. Those who propose a revocation mechanism argue that these have a disciplinary effect on elected officials, in which elected representatives will make fewer unpopular decisions if this may cause them to be more likely to be subject to a recall campaign. However, the same argument is also used against the recall: opponents argue that the recall completely undermines representative government as it causes elected officials fear to make unpopular but necessary decisions. Another argument in favor of direct democracy is that it provides voters with a continuous opportunity to make a democratic decision about who governs them, since they not only have the opportunity to elect the people who represent them every two to six years, but also to maintain a degree of control over the decision of its duration in the position. However, its opponents maintain that the mechanism of revocation could be used irresponsibly, and that this could be used by the political parties as a political weapon against the rival of the holders. The assertion that the revocation mechanism is being used as a political instrument was made by many Democrats against activists of Republican parties in connection with the recall in California in 2003.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers