France took control of <u>Syria</u> after World War.
Explanation:
Syria is a country located in the Middle East. This country has a large history, in ancient history was part of Babylon; in the Middle Age was part of Roman Empire and Byzantine Empire; in the XVI century was taken for the Turkish and finally in the XX century after the First World War England and France took control of it, but these nations agreed in 1916 that France will take control while England will leave the country, from this date until 1964 France occupied the country and made a constitution charter. Thus the country which took control after the First World War was France.
<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>
