Answer:
The statement is not reasonable.
Step-by-step explanation:
Josefina gave away 130% of her stamp collection.
We cannot give more than what we have.
lets understand it mathematically.
suppose i have x stamp.
according to question, i have to give 130% of my stamp collection
130% of x = 130/100 x = 1.3x
so, i have to given 1.3x stamp while i do have only x stamp which does not make any sense.
maximum i can give is x stamp.
x stamp in percentage of my total stamp collection which is also x will be
= x/x*100 = 100%
Thus, maximum one can give is 100% of what he has.
Thus, we can say that Josefina gave away 130% of her stamp collection is not reasonable.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
When we scale an object by a scale factor, the side lengths become the scale factor times bigger than the previous sides. Therefore, with a scale factor of 6, the side lengths would be multiplied by 6.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
f(x) = 2x3 + 4
Stretch vertically be a factor of 2:
f(x) = 2*2x3 + 4 = 4x3 + 4
Shift 5 units to the left:
f(x) = 4(x+5)3 + 4
<span><span> x-4/x3-64</span> </span>Final result :<span> x4 - 64x3 - 4
—————————————
x3 </span>
Answer:
A. Valid
Step-by-step explanation:
The P-value is the probability of getting this result or sample statistic if the null hypothesis is true. That is why a low P-value (smaller than the significance level) is considered evidence to reject the null hypothesis, because the result has little probability of being due to chance.
The statement that the P-value is "the probability of getting results as extreme as or more extreme than the ones in this study if the drug is actually not effective" is valid, as the null hypothesis states generally the opposite of the objective of the study (demonstrate that the drug is effective), and the very low value of the P-value is indicative that this result, if the drug was not effective, has a very low probability.
