It seems like the details of what p and q <em>are </em>in this context aren't all that important; it's the logical structure of the statement "p⇒q" we need to look at. We read that logical statement as "p implies q," where p is our <em>hypothesis</em> and q is our <em>conclusion</em>. When we take the converse of a logical statement, we reverse the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, <em>p </em>wouldn't imply <em>q</em>, but <em>q </em>would imply <em>p</em> in the converse of p⇒q. We'd write this statement as:
q⇒p
Answer:
A. Total Money Contributed after n months = 
B. Total Money Contributed after 24 months = 
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Initial contribution = 
each month contribution =
After 1 month contributed = 
Solving for Part A
let n be the number of months
∴ Total Contribution after n months = Initial contribution + (each month contribution
Number of months = 
Solving for Part A
Now n= 24 months
∴ Total Contribution after 24 months = 
Answer:
a - b = 12
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
= 12 ← factor the numerator
a² - b² ← is a difference of squares and factors as
a² - b² = (a - b)(a + b)
Thus
= 12
Cancel the common factor (a + b) on numerator/ denominator, thus
a - b = 12
Two whole numbers
plssss mark as brilliant