If Congress amends the president’s budget, what happens to it?

2 answers:

5 0

<span>When the President proposes the budget for the government to the congress, they can amend it before passing. The U. S. Constitution in Article 1, Section 7 grants exclusive right to originate revenue related bills to the House of Representatives, who can make any changes they want before passing it.</span>

Alex73 [517]3 years ago

5 0

When Congress executes a balanced budget amendment, this means that federal spending cannot exceed federal receipts. In other words, the government cannot incur in an annual budget deficit as this would represent an unconstitutional action. Proponents of this amendment argue that this is a safety measure in order to protect future generations to be safe from economic wrongdoings fo their previous ones.

You might be interested in

What act of legislature renewed Lincoln's passion against slavery?

jok3333 [9.3K]

<span>The fugitive slave act was the act of legislature that renewed Lincoln's passion against slavery. This act held northerners accountable for returning runaway slaves, and if they did not return them to their owners, it was punishable by prison and fines.</span>

4 0

2 years ago

Please help this is urgent!!!

riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

Explanation:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who decides/rules if a law is on conflict with the Constitution?

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

The Supreme Court has the final say in any law making/Conflict

6 0

2 years ago

What does Michael Wood mean when he says “It was a rejection… of a whole way of understanding history”?

olga nikolaevna [1]

I'm a fan of historian Michael Wood! One of my favorite items from him was the BBC documentary series, "In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great."

The quote you mention from Wood comes from his historical researches regarding India. (You could also look for his BBC documentary series, "The Story of India.") The "rejection of a whole way of understanding history" was the way that Wood described the actions of Asoka (or Ashoka -- you'll see both spellings). Asoka was ruler from 268 to 232 BC of lands that would later become known as India. Asoka was a great conqueror but also someone who found enlightenment through Buddhism. After conquering the Kalinga region in eastern India, rather than feeling some great rush of pride or accomplishment because of their victory, Asoka felt guilty. So he worked hard to improve the lives of the Kalinga people that he had conquered. This was what Wood was referring to when he said Asoka's attitude/approach "was a rejection of a whole way of understanding history." Conquest was not something to be celebrated triumphantly. Rather, the conquerors had an obligation to those whom they had conquered.

4 0

3 years ago

Why did liberals support a free market economy

Triss [41]

Liberals saw free market economy as an opportunity for capitalist entrepreneurs to succeed.

A free market is an perfect system within which the costs for merchandise and services are set by the open market and shoppers, within which the laws and forces of supply and demand are free from any interference by a government, price-setting monopoly, or alternative authority.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers