Answer:
C. Indirect Proof
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two methods of indirect proof: proof of the contrapositive and proof by contradiction.
Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
A. Converting 2/9 to a decimal:
-------------------------------------
9 ) 2.0
_
the quotient is 0.2 recurring (0.2222.........) which can be written as 0.2
Hello good person. The answer is C, (4,7). If you replace the x's in both equations (4) and the y's i both equations (7) you would get your answer for both.
There are infinitely many ways to do this. One such way is to draw a very thin stretched out rectangle (say one that is very tall) and a square. Example: the rectangle is 100 by 2, while the square is 4 by 4.
Both the rectangle and the square have the same corresponding angle measures. All angles are 90 degrees.
However, the figures are not similar. You cannot scale the rectangle to have it line up with the square. The proportions of the sides do not lead to the same ratio
100/4 = 25
2/4 = 0.5
so 100/4 = 2/4 is not a true equation. This numerically proves the figures are not similar.
side note: if you are working with triangles, then all you need are two pairs of congruent corresponding angles. If you have more than three sides for the polygon, then you'll need to confirm the sides are in proportion along with the angles being congruent as well.
The linear function should be y=2 i apologize if i am wrong
