The argument was about whether slaves would count as part of the population. The population affected how many seats the states got in the house. Southern states wanted them to count (more slaves were owned here) and Northern states did not want them to count (lesser slaves were owned here). Eventually they decided to count each slave as 3/5th of a citizen.
btw i might have mixed the north and south up so make sure you double check that online lol
Answer:
One of the roles of Federal courts is to review cases that have been appealed in the state courts, Option A.
Explanation:
Federal courts hear many cases like the cases which involve constitutionality of a law. There may be cases which involves treaties of public ministers or Ambassadors, disputes between two or more states can also be resolved by federal courts.
In 1950s, though the Constitution had stated that everyone is equal but still African Americans were not always treated equally. Federal courts could take cases that have been appealed in state courts, in case the concerned person is not happy with the result.
Answer:
The correct term to answer your question is Relational Database.
Explanation:
A relational database is a database specifically structured to recognize relations between stored items information and can be joined through common fields and the data can be easily stored in tables.
Answer:
James Madison
Explanation:
HJames Madison, based on his experience and knowledge, he concluded that there is dangers inherent in the powerful state legislatures and of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Thus, in the year 1787, in his essay, Federalist 45, Madison developed an argument about whether the expanded powers of the national government benefits or hinders policy making.
He argued that the proper division of power itself hinder the threats to our liberties because officials at both levels of government; state and federal, would jostle for citizens’ favour.
