1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cupoosta [38]
3 years ago
5

How did nationalism make world war one more likely? include information from internal dissent please

History
1 answer:
34kurt3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It was pan-Slavic nationalism that inspired the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo in June 1914, an event that led directly to the outbreak of World War I

Explanation:

If this hadn't happened the war would have taken longer to form making it more likely that we would join the war earlier on.

You might be interested in
Why was Charles Schenck arrested? What did he do that was illegal?
Daniel [21]
Charles  Schnenck  was arrested  for his antiwar activities during World War One.  He opposed the war because it would only led to mass suffering and death and will only benefit the rich who stand to profit from the war.  He was arrested under the Espionage Act on the grounds that during times of war, limiting the freedom of speech was justified.
(:D)
5 0
3 years ago
Who helped create the Republic of China in 1912 through efforts that began in the late nineteenth century?
olchik [2.2K]

Sun Yat-sen is your answer. Hope this Helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are colors of the rainbow related to white light from the sun
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

Option:A (white light is made up of all colors of the rainbow)

Explanation:

hoped this helped brainliest is very much appreciated also this is chemistry not history :)

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What did royal women wear in Africa? I'm writing a book and would like to know for refrences.
Otrada [13]
This really depends on the year. Some African women would wear beads, to show their status. The royal women didn't really dress too differently from their citizens, although there may have been a significant difference between patterns on the fabric. I'd guess they had something ornamental upon their heads. I do recall learning that women who (Research this, because I'm not too sure) showed great warrior-ism wore golden neck rings, which they wore at all times. If they took them off, their head would be unsupported and they'd be paralyzed or die. Also, what is your book's genre? My book that I've written is fantasy.
6 0
3 years ago
Was the united state correct 1945 when it became the first nation to use atomic weapons against japan to end world war 2 or was
Dominik [7]

Answer:

It was a morally wrong decision to drop the atomic bombs.

Explanation:

This is a heavily debated opinion-based question where you can go both ways. In my personal opinion, I personally argue that it was morally wrong for the US to use atomic weapons on Japan. Below is my reasoning.

1. Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender previous to the dropping of the atomic bombs, meaning that they were not a military necessity.

Prior to the dropping of the atomic bombs, Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender under the single condition that their emperor would not be harmed. (This was mainly due to cultural reasons that made the emperor a particularly important figure) Instead of accepting, the United States instead decided to fight for unconditional surrender. While they did achieve that in the end, they ended up not harming the emperor anyway, meaning that they could have just accepted Japan's surrender in my personal opinion. Moreover, this desire disproves the argument that the decision to drop the bomb was a military necessity and many contribute Japan's surrender more so to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria which meant Japan now had to fight a two-front war.

2. Atomic weapons are a form of indiscriminite killing.

Atomic weapons don't have eyes. They can't tell the difference between the military and civilians. Thousands of women and children were killed that had no involvement in the war. It is a war crime to intentionally target civilians, so why would atomic weapons be ethically acceptable? While the US did drop leaflets to warn civilians prior to the attacks, this act is not enough, and it cannot be expected for millions to flee thier homes.

3. The government may have been considering diplomatic reasons rather than solely ending the war.

If the US was really after a speedy end to the end of the war, there could have been many other ways to go about it. They could have continued to firebomb cities or accept conditional surrender. Some have argued that the diplomatic effects that came with it such as scaring the Soviets and proving US dominance were also in policymakers' minds. If the US had not been victorious in World War II, several important members of the government would have likely been tried as war criminals.

The Counter Argument:

Of course, there is also a qualified opposing view when it comes to this. It is perfectly valid to argue that the bomb was necessary for ending the war: as it is impossible to know the "what ifs" had history not happened the way it did. It is undeniable that the atomic bomb likely saved thousands of American lives if the war would have continued, and the war did ultimately come to an end a couple of days after the atomic bombs. There also is not enough evidence as to what exactly was the reason the Japanese unconditionally surrendered: it could have been Manchuria or the atomic bomb, both, or even other reasons entirely. Lastly, the general public did approve of the bombings at the time.

In recent years, the public have slowly become more critical of the bombings, although it remains a weighted moral debate.

Note: These are my personal views and this does explicitly represent the views of anyone else. Please let me know if you have any questions :)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the scramble for africa affect african countries even after european imperialism in the region had ended?
    10·2 answers
  • What government policies made places like the Carlisle Indian school necessary?
    10·1 answer
  • The north was mainly an ______ society, where many people held jobs cities
    11·1 answer
  • Why were Italians attracted to fascism in the 1920's?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not an authoritarian form of government?
    5·1 answer
  • What were at least three effects of this migration to the suburbs 1950s?
    15·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt below and answer the question.
    7·1 answer
  • When does a governors term of office begin
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main reason for the prosperity of the Phoenician city-states?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Great Plains attractive to settlers in the 1800s, even though it was sometimes referred to as the “Great American De
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!