1.You can still always have power over your land.
2.No matter what you still can rule.
This depends on ideals and opinions but from my point of view it is not a fair and democratic way of selecting the president due to the fact that the citizens of this country have no real say in who is president. Therefore it is not democratic. Fair? No because the electoral college Can have biases just like any other human and they are not the majority. This goes hand in hand with the democracy question. If I was to be democratic. The citizens should cancel out what the electoral college says.
Now I’m the side of the reasoning as to why the electoral college exists. It’s understandable. Everyone is not trustable enough to decide the fate of the country. Overall it is not fair and democratic.
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
The correct answer is A. The man who assassinated Kennedy.
Explanation
John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) was the president of the United States from 1961 to 1963 when he was killed in the city of Dallas in the state of Texas by Lee Harvey Oswald, who days later would also be killed by Jack Ruby in a confusing episode when he was being taken to an investigation before a judge. The reasons for Lee Harvey Oswald to assassinate the president are uncertain, but when he was killed a few days after the President's assassination there was no clarity about the fact beyond the insistent self-declaration as innocent of Harvey Oswald. So, the correct answer is A. The man who assassinated Kennedy.
