It's somewhat a matter of opinion, since many people have their favorites and it always looks good if you answer "Nelson Mandela". The truth is that after WW 2, the world got divided into a "Western" bloc under US leadership and a Communist bloc under the Soviet Union. The various US Presidents and Communist Party Secretaries all shaped the world in the Cold War era. A good candidate however is Soviet party leader Mikhail Gorbatchev, who practically single-handedly dismantled the old Soviet Union and thereby ended Communist rule over many eastern European countries. Americans tend to thank Ronald Reagan for that, but that is vastly overrating his actual influence on affairs. We Westerners like Gorbatchev for that, but in Russia he is generally seen as a weak leader and the man who 'sold out' Russia's global power and prestige and who was responsible for much of the following unrest until "thank God" Vladimir Putin took firm control and put Russia back on the map again.
<u>Opinion on the statement "Antagonism arose among the conquered nomadic tribes of the Xiongnu":</u>
The Xiongnu made civil war in monastic nomadic existence in the second and third decades B.C.E. when they created a much more unified and patriarchal democratic system than for the monastic societies of the old days.
By the 1960s, it became evident that, amid irregular antagonism, farm workers and portable agriculturalists were involved in a mutually beneficial relationship. Moreover, groups keep switching between nomadism and sedentism, based in part on the strength of the centralized authority.
In the 1970s, Rowton used the terminology "attached nomadism" and "genetically determined chiefdom" to show the type of social structure distinctive of old Mari, "which reflects a curious mixture of town-state, clan, and nomadism”.
In the coming years, archaeologists, astrologists, and scholars extended this deeper understanding of nomadic revivals to physically active society to the study of the origins of advanced monastic nomadism.
Answer:
Competing.
Explanation:
Competition is when two or more parties or groups have to fight against one another to get to a common aim. It usually involves the need to get access to a certain thing, be it food or other items necessary for one's success or survival.
In the given scenario of humans and tigers, it is obviously evident that they are competing against each other for survival, food, and habitation. Humans move into the tigers' habitat, cutting down jungles that are the safety habitat of tigers, further pushing them away from their own space. This intrusion into their space, and the clearing of forest areas to cultivate crops and over-hunting animals which were also the food source for these predators all pit the tigers against the humans. Thus, the <u>scenario is that of a competition between the tigers and humans.
</u>
Answer:
I would say 1
Explanation:
I do know that there was a space surrounding the colonies that was considered safe and if you went beyond that then you were on your own
D.levying taxes this is the answer
