Answer:
Whether writing a philosophical essay or a policy paper, Douglass' voice was direct and engaging. It's not uncommon for him to use an unexpected tone, or the tone of someone who has actually survived something catastrophic. The intellectual and genuine struggle of Douglass is to free himself from oppression.
In some cases, Fredrick employs harsh language to explain what happened. A passionate and irate tone is added to his voice in an attempt to mask it. He does a good job of maintaining a calm and composed demeanor throughout the introduction. Whatever the case may be, he does occasionally employ strong and passionate language. This effectively causes the pursuer to feel enraged and annoyed by oppression, just as he requires them to.
Based on his actions with the beggar at the city gate, it can be inferred about the king in "A Just Judge" that "B. He wishes to <span>escape his duties and responsibilities."</span>
Answer:
Prophet
Explanation:
The narrator becomes angry, calling the raven a "thing of evil" and a "prophet". Finally, he asks the raven whether he will be reunited with Lenore in Heaven.
Answer:C whenever internet users surf the web.....
Explanation:He uses probably in his sentence which proves that it is not a factual statement and using his own point of view with his bias/opinion.
The answer to this question would be third person omniscient because, the narrator knows the whole story. Omniscient means all knowing. Third person limited would not know the whole story.
