1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
4 years ago
15

What, besides increased agricultural productivity, were the benefits for developing nations of the green revolution that took pl

ace in the second half of the twentieth century?
History
1 answer:
Cerrena [4.2K]4 years ago
6 0
Less people needed/more efficient. makes new jobs possible cause a bunch of farmers arnt tied up in the fields.
increased GDP,
greater security found in more food
increased capacity of people
increased exports

You might be interested in
20 POINTS!! PLEASE HELP
Nonamiya [84]

Answer: A) The United States believed Saddam Hussein had WMDs.

C) The United States believed that Osama bin Laden was hiding in Iraq.  hope I helped :)              

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would a pro-slavery (for slavery) settler in Kansas argue to justifiy their actions after the passing of the
Norma-Jean [14]

Pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to Kansas, each side hoping to determine the results of the first election held after the law went into effect. ... Opponents of the Kansas-Nebraska Act helped found the Republican Party, which opposed the spread of slavery into the territories.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the vocab word
Bumek [7]

Answer:

a referee

Explanation:

if this is from a book just go back to the book and put where u found your answer ex: paragraph 3 , Line 4

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was the founding of Georgia different than the other twelve colonies? O It was founded for religious freedom. O It was found
Serggg [28]

Answer:

it was founded for economic freedom

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can you use this Document E to argue that Alexander was great? *
rosijanka [135]

Answer:

Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.

Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.

Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.

Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.

Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which characteristic is correctly matched with a number in the table?
    6·1 answer
  • Question 1- How do you think the sneak attack by the Japanese at pearl harbor, which killed nearly 3,000 Americans, impact the g
    6·1 answer
  • What did this emperor want Germany to do?
    10·2 answers
  • ______ is the specification of the jobs to be done within an organization and the ways in which those jobs relate to one another
    10·1 answer
  • What does Domestic Tranquility mean?
    11·2 answers
  • Where did the Black Death Start and how did it<br> travel from place to place?
    7·1 answer
  • Why does Lincoln worry about Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland and Delaware?
    13·1 answer
  • In 1918, turkey differed from many middle eastern nations because of its devotion to_
    11·1 answer
  • AP US History question:
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAILIEST AND 100 POINTS
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!