1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juli2301 [7.4K]
3 years ago
6

What is a possible drawback to direct democracy and how might it be resolved

History
1 answer:
Liula [17]3 years ago
3 0
One drawback to direct democracy is that there would still be corruption. Corruption would still exists.
You might be interested in
Why did the English have poor relations with the Native Americans
Zepler [3.9K]
Mainly because the English wanted to take over America and enslave the ''Indians" is my guess. But also, the First Thanksgiving might have had something to do with it. It wasn't really that they both had poor relations, it was that the English believed the Native Americans didn't belong on their own land and persecuted them for it.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As a result of the defeat of Japan in world war II, Nationalists and Communists were able to resume their struggly for control o
OleMash [197]

Answer:

China became communist and than china allied it self with the soviet union rising tensions in the west.

Please give brainlist

6 0
2 years ago
Why do you believe the Arab-Israeli conflict has persisted since 1948? Give me a paragraph
kogti [31]

The Arab-Israeli conflict has persisted since 1948, because, frankly, the Palestinians and many of the Arabian states fail to either accept or they break the treaties created by outside influences to help the situation in the area. The only two countries that have signed treaties with Israel is Egypt in 1979, and Jordan in 1994, with Egypt being the only country that really holds to their treaty.

Why would the Palestinians and Arabs continue to persist in their want of destruction for the Isreali country? After all, the Palestinian Covenant, formerly known as the Hamas Covenant, the ruling party and a terrorist organization, demands that they would not stop attacking Israel until it is utterly destroyed. When this is indoctrinated into the people, they fail to see their neighbor of Israel as human (see where this is going? World War II?), and continue their aggression in an effort to "take back their homeland", in which it wasn't even rightfully theirs, and to exterminate the Jews (which sounds a lot like the Nazi Doctrine during World War II). With this in mind, most of the countries and terrorist organizations would accept nothing less then the removal of the state of Israel, and the destruction of her people.

On top of that, there are many groups in the US who fails to see the conflict in it's light of truth. For example, the LGBTQ+++ community heavily condemns Israel (ironically), even though Israel is the only country in the Middle East to allow the LGBTQ+++ community to have a presence. Other countries, particularly European ones, also fail to see the benefits of having Israel in the Middle East as a safe haven for military actions in the area, and focus on feeding the Palestinians "tablespoons of power" by condemning Israel in U.N. meetings, much to no effect.

How should one go about to regaining peace in the area? Ironically, the way to maintain a fairly <em>uneasy</em> peace is to allow Israel to build up it's military forces and use a heavily dominate security force to secure her border. Even then, terrorist groups located in Palestinian lands cannot be reigned in by just a security force, and so the conflict would not truly end. Remember, on one side, they are asking for the destruction of a people group on all cost, while the other side is trying to defend herself.

Has the Arab-Isreali conflict persisted since 1948? It not only has persisted, but grew worse over time.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement about the U.S. invasion of Iraq is true? A. After the Iraqi army was defeated, a costly civil war broke out, whi
Ksju [112]
The answer is A) After the Iraqi Army was defeated, a costly civil war broke out, which President Bush hadn't planned for
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Theodore Roosevelt enact "control of corporations" while he was president?
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:   The Square Deal was Theodore Roosevelt's domestic program, which reflected his three major goals: conservation of natural resources, control of corporations, and consumer protection. These three demands are often referred to as the "three Cs" of Roosevelt's Square Deal.

Explanation:  One of Roosevelt's acts as president was to deliver a 20,000-word address to Congress asking it to curb the power of large corporations (called "trusts"). He also spoke in support of organized labor to further chagrin big business, but to their delight, he endorsed the gold standard, protective tariffs and lower taxes.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please write a summary for each of them thanks!<br>(picture included!)
    12·2 answers
  • Which organ remained in the body during mummification, as it was believed to control a person's emotions and intellect ?
    14·1 answer
  • What can you infer about the economy, ideology, and technology of the Mongols from the descriptions given?
    11·1 answer
  • To what extent were the ideals of the American Revolution realized in the first 100 years?​
    12·1 answer
  • How to write a letter
    10·2 answers
  • How effective were unions in shaping political and economic policies? Do you think unions became too powerful? Explain
    11·1 answer
  • What was life like in England in the 1600 S
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following are characteristics of facts? Check all that apply.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these values was central to the Transcendentalist writers?
    13·1 answer
  • What causes convection currents in earth's mantle?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!