The correct answer is <em>b), most states had passed some safety laws, but enforcement varied.
</em>
As the laws were not enforced, the working conditions were to a minimum. People worked in horrible conditions. Most of them risk themselves doing its activities due to unsafe practices. Accidents were common because there were no training and safety measures to prepare the worker and prevent labor risks.
Answer: Looking for a better life and opportunities.
Explanation: um hm.
Answer: d) empathy mindset.
Explanation:
Empathy mindset is defined as the understanding mechanism of feeling and emotion of any individual.People share their feeling so that others can perceive about their state.This mindset hold certain attitude and thinking held by person regarding empathy development,management and control.
Other options are incorrect because attribution factor, checking the perception and algebraic expression does not relate with empathy increment or decrement. Thus, the correct option is option(d).
<span>The company was wanting to ensure that confidential data and company secrets weren't being leaked to outsiders. These people may use the information in ways that would hurt the business in the long-term, which is then used as a reason for terminating the employee.</span>
Answer:
This question is incomplete. It is missing names and descriptions of the court cases descriptions that are needed to be matched. Here they are (correctly matched):
<em>Tape v. Hurley: </em><em>The California Supreme Court forced San Francisco to admit Chinese students into public schools.
</em>
- This case ended in <u>March 1885</u>, with the Supreme Court decision that refusal to admit a Chinese American student Mamie Tape to the all-white Spring Valley School was unlawful. This was a landmark court case.
<em>United States v. Wong Kim Ark: </em><em>The Supreme Court ruled the Fourteenth Amendment awarded citizenship to children of Chinese immigrants born on American soil.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>March 28, 1898</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873 to Chinese couple, was unlawfully denied entry to the United States after his trip abroad.
<em>Yick Wo v. Hopkins:</em><em> The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the city of San Francisco to grant licenses to Chinese laundries.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>May 10, 1886</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that the administration of law in a discriminating manner is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In particular, here out of 200 applications, only one permit to operate a wooden building laundry was granted to a Chinese owner, while all non-Chinese owners always received permits.