David Crockett died, It was his last stand.
Answer:
Olivia is conducting a longitudinal study on adolescence. During the first wave she interviewed each participant about their familial relationships. She used the information she obtained to develop a measure of familial relationships that she administered during the second wave of the study. In the first wave, Olivia used <u>qualitative research</u>, in the second wave she used <u>quantitative research</u>.
Explanation:
The qualitative research can be seen as a term that covers a series of methods and techniques with interpretive value that aims to describe, analyze, decode, translate and synthesize the meaning of facts that arise more or less naturally. It has a naturalistic interpretive approach towards its object of study, so it studies reality in its natural context, interpreting and analyzing the meaning of the phenomena according to the meanings it has for the people involved. Quantitative research is one in which quantitative data on variables are collected and analyzed. Its purpose is to find general laws that explain the nature of its object of study from observation, verification and experience. That is, from the analysis of experimental results that yield verifiable numerical or statistical representations.
The state legislature are responsible for drawing the boundary lines.
The state legislatures are the ones that are primarily responsible for the redistricting process. They draw the boundary lines for each of the electoral districts.
This is applicable in about 25 states, while in some other states, the state governor is the one in charge of this process.
The redistricting process is the process of dividing areas into newer political districts.
Read more on brainly.com/question/20072672?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The cases were about racial segregation.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education(1954) was a Supreme Court case which ruled that children's racial segregation in government's schools was illegal. The decision by the Supreme court showed that everyone is equal despite their colour or religion.
Milliken v. Bradley(1974) was a Supreme Court case in the United States regarding the outlined desegregation of busing among public school students in Detroit. There was a plan to blend students of different races in United States public schools following the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The decision was the opposite of the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education as segregation was encouraged.
The court refused to remedy unequal and separate education. Children need to learn together and understand each other. I believe voters who disagreed with the ruling could have made a peaceful protest regarding the decision made. Also, since the public schools were mainly funded by taxes, the people who opposed the decision could have refused to pay tax in order to voice their opinions on the issues.
