I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
Qualitative research
Explanation:
This approach is used to gain an understanding of underlying motivation, reasons, and opinions. It provides the idea or insight into the problem and to gain knowledge on the area of work related to the research topic. Qualitative research includes interviews, direct observation of the subject.
Healthy ecosystems clean our water, purify our air, maintain our soil, regulate the climate, recycle nutrients and provide us with food. They provide raw materials and resources for medicines and other purposes
I believe that the answer is about 24 percent.<span />
<span>Gerald is engaged in active listening. Active listening is when someone puts everything into understanding, feeling and empathizing with the person who is speaking, in this case, Gerald's friend. Active listening can be used in a wide variety of situations including professional and personal settings.</span>
