Answer:
first-person narration.
Explanation:
Note the word "me", which is commonly used when the author is talking about his/herself. This means that it is through the perspective of the author, and so it's a first-person narration.
~
Answer:
That is a fragment. if you went to someone and said "to apply for a job at the new store in the mall" they would be confused
What I think the beautiful meaning behind this is...
Losing friends or followers can happen in life, friends come and go, and sometimes you don't need friends to be happy. But if you follow other people and believe their lies and stick to their opinion even though you might not agree with their opinion, you are under their control. Not only you are under their control, but you pretend to be something else by agreeing to these opinions and pretending you agree. Never always follow other people, you don't need to be the follower. Be the leader of your own tribe.
<em>Hope this helps & hope this is an important message! </em>
<em> ~Hocus Pocus</em>
B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.