1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luba_88 [7]
3 years ago
13

Socialists believed that factories, land, capital, and raw materials should be

History
2 answers:
rjkz [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:    C.  Owned by society.

Explanation:  The Socialists considered that all means of production, resources, factories, land and raw materials should be owned by society, as a transitional form towards the establishment of communism. Marx was a socialist theorist who devised all these social relations, and within them, the ownership of all goods by society. On the contrary, the capitalists have the attitude that everything should be in the hands of the private owners.

Sholpan [36]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is 

<span>c.
owned by society.

It is in the name :) Hope I helped

</span>
You might be interested in
Which continent is the second largest landmass and the second most populated, with more than 900 million people?
Dimas [21]
Africa is the second largest
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 10 of 20:
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

C. asteroid is large enough to create a gravitational force that is strong enough.

Explanation:

Basically all celestial bodies are subject to Gravity among them, so the rules of gravity apply for the strongest to the smallest, the strongest attract the weakers into their orbit, so an asteriod can have a moon since a moon it´s just a weaker celestial body with a weaker gravity force that is attracted towards another bigger celestial body. An asteriod just would have to find a celestial body with a weaker gravity force and strong enough to endure traveling alongside the asteriod.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the Renaissance improve the lives of women or did it entrench women further into
natka813 [3]

Answer:

The question of “did women have a renaissance” is not something that has not been asked before. In 1977 Joan Kelly wrote an essay addressing this question specifically. In the Renaissance, when the political systems changed from the Medieval feudal systems, women of every social class saw a change in their social and political options that men did not. Celibacy became the female norm and "the relations of the sexes were restructured to one of female dependency and male domination" (Kelly 20). Women lived the life of the underlying sex. Men ruled over everything, even through half a century of Queens.

“When England was ruled for half a century by Queens but women had almost no legal power; When marriage, a women’s main vocation, cost them their personal property rights; when the ideal women was rarely seen and never heard in public; when the clothes a women wore were legally dictated by her social class; when almost all school teachers were men; when medicine was prepared and purified at home; when corsets were

constructed of wood and cosmetics made of bacon and eggs; when only half of all babies survived to adulthood?" (Hull 15).

The above passage says a lot about women in the Renaissance. The role of women was a very scarce role. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. Rarely seen at that. Women were to be prim and proper, the ideal women. Females were able to speak their minds but their thoughts and ideas were shaped by men. Mostly everything women did had input given by men. Women were controlled by her parents from the day she is born until the day she is married, then she would be handed directly to her husband so he could take over that role. In the time of the renaissance women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical ‘housewives.'

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What did traders and travelers from south asia bring with them?
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

butt cheeks

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why was it necessary to enact the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments?
Goshia [24]
Yes it was necessary. it gave alot of freedom to woman to and womans rights.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • After the army was mobilized and surrounded Paris. The people were fearful. To arm themselves, what did they do?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the First Great Awakening impact how colonists practiced Christianity?
    14·1 answer
  • Which innovation enabled ordinary people to buy cars? A. Thomas Edison's use of electricity to keep factories open around the cl
    15·1 answer
  • In what ways did enslaved people cope with their captivity?
    11·1 answer
  • What were the three biggest arguments within president trumps campaign
    12·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to answer the questions.
    15·1 answer
  • What was the primary cause of the depletion of the atlantic cod fishery?
    9·1 answer
  • What are two ways that the soviet people lost their freedom due to communism in the soviet union ?
    8·1 answer
  • The Ming dynasty ruled China from 1368 to 1646. During that time, Chinese shipbuilding and navigation techniques were developed.
    5·1 answer
  • The Fourteenth Amendment, along with the Thirteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, are known as the Reconstruction Amendments. These
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!