Answer:
(A) Increased civil rights and liberties
(B) A constitutional democracy
(D) A national legislature
Explanation:
Hello there!
Here is my OPINION/ interpretation. I may or may not be incorrect.
1). The US shouldn't sell arms (weapons) overseas because it would cause a war, and the US's goal was to stay isolated, hence the term isolationism.
Arms = weapons
Arms = body part
Selling weapons across the to Britain could cause conflicts, which could lead to war.
However, (in the first image), of they didn't sell weapons, they'd remain neutral, therefore avoiding war and its costs.
2). This cartoon MAY be trying to persuade the reader that war isn't always the solution to resolving a conflict, and that isolationism can lead to peace and unity.
Again, this is MY OPINION.
Hope this helped! :)
---------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: I am not a professional tutor or have any professional background in your subject. Please do not copy my work down, as that will only make things harder for you in the long run. Take the time to really understand this, and it'll make future problems easier. I am human, and may make mistakes, despite my best efforts. Again, I possess no professional background in your subject, so anything you do with my help will be your responsibility. Thank you for reading this, and have a wonderful day/night!
Answer:
Some states demanded that the U.S. Constitution include a Bill of Rights so that people’s rights could be protected against infringement from any powerful government, public officer/official, and wealthy or powerful citizens.
Some states demanded that the U.S. Constitution include a Bill of Rights because they thought it would be important to protect each individual’s liberty from any government or person who would want to use their power to deprive individuals of personal rights, such as freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of press, etc.
Explanation:
Answer:
taxes on imported tea, supplies, food, stamps
Explanation:
The main way in which the Supreme Court redefined commerce with their ruling in gibbons v. Ogden is that they determined that the power of the US government to regulate interstate commerce also applies to navigation, which had significant implications for trade.
