Answer:
The correct answers are C, <em>calling for immediate federal funding to support financial institutions troubled by bank runs</em> and D, <em>creating a series of federal programs to provide employment on public works</em>.
Explanation:
Republican President Herbert Hoover (1874-1964) firmly believed the government should not intervene in the economic field. Because of this his administration only actively fought the economical crisis in early 1932, when unemployment was around 23%.
During that year Hoover's administration got Congress to approve the creation of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC), an institution to financially support states' governments and financial institutions. RFC saved a few banks but not enough to ease the crisis.
In mid-1932 Hoover signed the Emergency Relief and Construction Act that liberated public funds for public works to provide employment.
Options A, B and E are wrong:
When the government worked on the housing field for low-income individuals it was not through tax cuts; (A)
it did not urge private agencies to organize relief efforts, only to not cut wages during the beginning of the crisis; (B)
on the contrary, Hoover established a moratorium on foreign debts related to World War I (1914-1918) to stop the European crisis caused by the American crisis aiming to help both economies. (E)
Answer:
FALSE because the Alamo got the name by a grove of nearby cottonwood trees,
Explanation: Hope this helps :))
1 is the answer to your question.
Answer:
I think...
Explanation:
It made it possible to separate the seeds from the cotton fiber much faster.
It made cotton farming far more profitable for the plantation owner.
It increased the speed at which cotton could be harvested in the fields.
It led to an increase in the number of plantations across the South.
It caused planters to buy more enslaved people to harvest cotton.
The fact that the leaders of the Argentina kidnapped, ignored, threatened, and deported them best describe what the military leaders in Argentina did to the people who are willing and has the guts to disagree to whatever their policies are.
