<u>Answer:
</u>
The one thing that is wrong with Mr. Jacobs' conclusion is that he has failed to consider that there can be other possible explanations for his results.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The fact that Mr. Jacobs conducted a 're-test' with the same questions in the test can be deemed to be a possibility behind the results of the tests having come out positive.
- Other than that, it can be considered that not the new method of physical education, but some other activity done by the students over the span of 8 months might have made the students better at the test.
C I think correct me if I’m wrong
Answer:
The correct answer is A: a time element
Explanation:
From the reading "A Scientific View of Risk", it was clear that there is risk in almost every activity we do; be it smoking due to its health concerns, or drinking and driving. However, what matters the most or what increases the risk of from a scientific point of view is the length of time spent performing an activity or being exposed to the risk factor. It believes that risk is a probability and is dependent on the length of time spent on an activity.
its important because the gov cant have too much power
Answer:
misattribution of arousal
Explanation:
Terri is relying on the psychological concept known as misattribution of arousal.
Misattribution of arousal in psychology is the concept used to describe the situation whereby individuals can be aroused by sources other than what was supposed to cause the arousal, it is when individuals wrongly attribute the stimulus that is responsible for their physiological arousal.
Terri's client may not have been aroused by the first date but by the expectation that a first date should result in physiological arousal.
