C because parliment kicked them out and told the british they couldnt control the english anymore
I think the answer is C not sure tho :)
In the Case "Munn vs Illinois" of 1880, Munn challenged the law of the state of Illinois which permitted the maximum set of rates for the use of grain elevators. Munn, who owned a grain elevator, claimed that the state was depriving him the right for their liberty of property and therefore violated the 14th amendment. However, the Supreme Court ended up disagreeing and ruled against Munn.
It is because they are "kindly" offering him a new home, and to pay all of the expenses of his whole settlement.
hope this help and have a good day
