Answer: D
Explanation:
Just took the quiz and got it right. A P E X
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
B because when you lease a car you can only have a certain amount of miles that you can travile with
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the increase or decrease in the retained earnings will be calculated as:
= (10,000,000 - 400,000) × 15% × $15
= 9,600,000 × 0.15 × 15
= 21,600,000
The retained earnings will decrease by $21.6 million
The options given aren't correct.
Answer:
Process innovation
Explanation:
In this situation, an existing product, the gold standard Encyclopaedia Britannica, begins to be distributed through a different media in order to adapt to cultural and market changes. This change in the production and delivery methods of existing products is known as a process innovation.
