A because they wanted to transport goodsback and fortj
This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question
Based on your reading of the Challenger case, do you think the advocacy or inquiry approach dominated the decision-making process?
Answer: advocacy approach
Explanation:
The fact that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had dismissed probabilistic risk analyses has been pointed out as the main cause of the Challenger catastrophe. In this case, advocacy dominated the inquiry approach, as management didn´t allow further inquires in probabilistic risk analysis, prioritizing the design-oriented approach that predominated in NASA during the 1970s.
Answer:
Inductive reasoning: starts with specific cases and develops general principles.
Deductive reasoning: starts with general principles and examines specifics.
Deductive and Speculative: looks at one example and describes its essential qualities.
Critical and poetic: criticizes traditional philosophical thinking and engages philosophical thinking and engages in tentative speculative reasoning.
Explanation:
Answer:
Calvinism had great influence throughout the world and as a result of this, there were many supporters to back up and vote in favor of chauvinistic ideas. As more governments were becoming democratic, more votes made more of the decisions.
Explanation:
I don't know a whole lot of Calvinism but this is the best I could do in 10 minutes
