I’m just thinking something from the top of my head so it may not be much help
So if weathering didn’t exist, there wouldn’t be anything to break up earth’s crust naturally. So by assumptions, the rocks on earth would be larger than they actually are since there’s nothing to break them up into smaller parts.
Overall, I’m not really sure, but all I know is that it’ll mess up the rock cycle that we have now.
Hoped this helped.
Answer:
A quote.
Explanation:
The authors involve a variety of evidences to substantiate and validate their claim. These evidences may include a quotation, reference, etc. that serve to establish the credibility of a claim. An argumentative essay always require sufficient worthy evidence in order to establish the accuracy and truth of their argument.
In the given example, the kind of evidence that has been employed here would exemplify 'a quote' as it involves the use of quotation marks(") to repeat or restate the claim of Dr. Ella Charmin to establish the credibility of the argument and enhance the reliability of her argumentative essay. Thus, it exemplifies <u>'a quote'</u>.
Answer:
Create a point system.
Explanation:
If there was a point system included for days the younger students independently read at home, it would help motivate them. They would gain in two ways: reading more, and gaining points. At the end there could be some sort of prizes such as toys or mini coupons.
Are owned by local state or federal government
The answer is "<span>Today's older people are happier than college students."
</span>
A cross-sectional study is a kind of observational investigation that dissects information from a populace, or an agent subset, at a particular point in time, that is, cross-sectional data. Cross-sectional examinations are instinctively clear and take into consideration the examination of countless. The strategies can be institutionalized by the scientist, and obvious definitions can be connected to the presentation and the endpoints.
