I’m so sorry if it’s wrong but I believe it’s either between... the first option- move toward more or the 3rd option- cautiously embraced. But if I were to choose which one I think I would go with the 1st option as my answer
Answer: move toward more
Explanation: Because of nearly all composers use dissonance in their music. Without dissonance, there would be no tension and release in music and it would all be VERY boring and bland. Dissonances are nothing new at all and certainly not restricted to the 20th century; in the 14th and 15th centuries these could be quite harsh and not always resolved in the way we would expect today.
Dissonance adds expression to music and as composers' techniques became more and more sophisticated, so did the harmonic language. Dissonance can be used for musical 'colour' and to create extreme tension and drama in music.
In short, composers in the 20th (and 21st) century used dissonance for very similar reasons to composers in every other century.
According to yahoo.com
I would say the benefits would be for example the right to vote in elections, the right to avail themselves of economic opportunities, the right to a higher education and the right to travel freely around the US and the right to form communities of similar ethnic and historical background such as the Latinamericans in the San Fernando Valley.,
People all over the world were in a state of desperation and poverty due to The Gear Depression starting just a decade prior. This would've lead many people to believe that Adolf Hitler and his fascist regime would help them out of this state of desperation and poverty
Answer:
I think it was all of them above?
Explanation:
More job opportunities (factories/industries)
Urbanization
worked for minimum wages
