This is certainly a sensible topic and I'm afraid there's no easy answer as it's very dependant on context.
The criteria for rejecting or accepting certain immigrants will vary depending on the cultural and political relationship between the country where each immigrant comes from and the country they intend to relocate to.
Every nation should aspire to generate conditions of tolerance in which ethnic or racial differences don't represent a threat to the safety of their communities. To achieve this, it would require governments a sustained effort to educate its people in favor of diversity and apply policies that encourage freedom and protect civil liberties. <u>However, </u>t<u>his is a long and arduous process that history has shown sometimes may take several centuries</u>.
In many cases, the tensions between different ethnicities and cultural backgrounds are so high at the present time, that there's no other way to ensure safety than limiting specific types of immigration in certain regions. That is why to me, it is legitimate for a country to take nationality, race and religion into account when deciding who they let in, as long as the government keeps moving towards tolerance in the long-run.
Hope this helps!
Enlightenment thinkers, John Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau
Um about eight years because the election he won was 2008
Answer:
I can only answer 8 and 9
8. desertification
9.geothermal energy
1. the role of a woman was at first good in a way because they were with the men out-and-about but later when “homes” were built and they werent like nomadic then women would stay in the house and prepare the food etc, overtime women had been seen as lesser and they were seen as property and nothing more than that, not allowed education just “useful for marriage” basically as time goes on it just gets worse and in america during the 80s n so even before like its still bad because the men are making decisions over abortion still have toxic views against women however now its a bit better but still work to be done ig
2. i think both mother and father are important because the child looks up to the both of them and they see how their mother or father acts and theyll “inherit” their behavior in a way obviously a child doesnt need both because a mom can be both the mother and father and same for the fathers but both influence the way the child acts idk if this helped
3. now women are maybe more “educated” on certain topics? the way the women lived their life whatever they dont like to see in the world theyll make sure their child isnt raised to end up like that
idk if any of this helped
