<span>King Arthur is a medieval, mythological figure
who was the head of the kingdom Camelot and the Knights of the Round
Table. It is not known if there was a real Arthur, though it is
believed he may have been a Roman-affiliated military leader who
successfully staved off a Saxon invasion during the 5th to 6th centuries</span>
The Tenure of Office Act restricted the president from suspending an officer while the Senate is not in session. In August 1867, President Johnson removed Secretary of War Stanton from office. When the Senate reconvened, it failed to ratify his removal. Johnson attempted to appoint a new Secretary of War. He hoped to create a case to challenge the act through the involvement of the Supreme Court.
<h3>~!+~!+~!+!+~!+~!+~!+~+!+~+!+~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+~!+~+!+~+!~+!+~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+~!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~</h3><h3 /><h3>Hello! If this answer doesn’t fulfill all of your questions, or it doesn’t have the exact information you are looking for, I apologize. But, I will try to help you to my best ability! <3</h3><h3 /><h2>Answer:</h2><h3>The most important players in the early fur trade were Indigenous peoples and the French. The French gave European goods to Indigenous people in exchange for beaver pelts. The fur trade was the most important industry in New France. With the money they made from furs, the French sent settlers to Canada.</h3><h3>France and England were bitter enemies at this time. Indeed, one of the principal goals of the French fur trade during the 1700s was to maintain strong ties and military alliances with the Indians. Between 1698 and 1763, France and England fought a series of four wars for control of North America.</h3><h3>By the early 1700s, the fur trade was firmly established in the Great Lakes region. The French empire was based on the fur trade in this region and required Native American alliances to sustain it. Native people and the French traded, lived together, and often married each other and built families together.</h3><h3>The fur trade led to the extinction of certain animals in some Indian lands, leading the Indians living there to seek furs on the lands of other tribes. The first was the British refusal to trade with Indians who had been French trading partners. The second was the British settlements on Indian lands.</h3><h3 /><h3>Again, hope this helps! Good luck! :D</h3><h3 /><h3>~!+~!+~!+!+~!+~!+~!+~+!+~+!+~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+~!+~+!+~+!~+!+~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+~!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~+!~</h3>
I believe the answer is A, because the Mayans were located right underneath the Guatemalan peninsula(which is that little island looking piece above A).
Answer:
Tried my best. Hope this helps! Please spell check, mine is being buggy today.
Explanation:
The parts of the stories that could be considered fountational myth is the fact that race was a word before whites and blacks met. It was a word with meant a competitive sport in which to people try to win over the other. It was added to with a secound definition after they noticed different ethnicities. Secoundly, it doesn't really explain what the need for the thrid to last sentence was. If it had gone into further clarity, maybe it would've tied in, but as it is it just doesn't make any sense. Lastly, it doesn't explain what whites were before the term race was invented. It comments about it, but that's as far as it goes.
